Though I have had some involvement with theatre over
the years, this was my first time on a theatrical stage since
playing a flutist in Comedy of Errors in 1993. Writing
for Steve is always a fun experience, and I am continually surprised
at how well we work together.
This time was fun because I got to be on stage
with him instead of out in the audience, and because most of
the music for this production is completely new. In the past
I’ve been the invisible collaborator, and we’ve
often recycled music from my catalog.
While that can be interesting, there’s nothing
like diving into a project with new expectations. In his monologue
performance, Steve tells his stories of Catholic grade
school and high school, finding the humorous and serious aspects
of the positive (and negative) role models of his youth. With references
to secular events (such as the Kennedy Assassination and the NASA
moon landing), as well as more religious happenings (the world’s
oldest nun giving sex advice, another nun teaching Marriage Class
and, of course, Vatican II and the Baltimore Catechism), Schrum seeks
to discover how his Catholic school education shaped the college
professor he is today.
While not Catholic myself, I grew up in an area gripped
hard by Catholic doctrine and dogma. I do not have first-person experience
of the same things that Steve talks about in this play, but as an
Italian American transplant to the Northeastern PA coal region who
didn’t go to any church, I do have similar experiences, so
I understood what Immaculate Misconceptions was getting
at, and immediately wanted to be a part of it even before I read
the script. What I did not know was that the material would speak
to me so much that it would conjure images and ideas that would go
beyond the scope of the play, and continue my interest in socio-political
topics (something I had shrugged off from an artistic standpoint).
Steve is probably the first person I have worked with
who has been just as self-critical about what he does on stage. And
yet, there was so much flexibility in our collaboration that I did
not feel I was being dictated to unjustly. In fact, I think Steve
was harder on himself in some ways than he needed to be. The last-minute
changes and interactions that came out of our rehearsals were proof
positive that we could do this stuff more often.
We both seemed to
focus well together, and our work ethic seemed to match well. Neither
of us wanted to rehearse things to death, but there were key places
where we clearly wanted to make sure we got things right. In the
places where mistakes were made, or transitions didn’t come
off as well as we’d hoped, we took it in stride. I'm looking
forward to offering this show locally.